Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 22.6%+0.0 pp · #2 | SAR 6,134,000+0 · #2 | 28.5%+0.0 pp · #2 | 88/100Severe · #2 | 53/100Selective · #2 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 29.2%+6.5 pp · #1 | SAR 9,381,000+3,247,000 · #1 | 34.8%+6.3 pp · #1 | 86/100Severe · #1 | 54/100Selective · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | 10.3%-12.4 pp · #8 | -SAR 114,000-6,248,000 · #8 | 15.4%-13.1 pp · #8 | 93/100Severe · #8 | 43/100Weak · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 17.0%-5.6 pp · #5 | SAR 3,644,000-2,490,000 · #4 | 22.3%-6.3 pp · #6 | 90/100Severe · #3 | 50/100Selective · #5 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 15.3%-7.4 pp · #6 | SAR 2,594,000-3,540,000 · #7 | 20.6%-7.9 pp · #7 | 90/100Severe · #4 | 48/100Weak · #7 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 19.7%-2.9 pp · #3 | SAR 4,719,000-1,415,000 · #3 | 25.6%-3.0 pp · #3 | 90/100Severe · #5 | 51/100Selective · #4 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 19.6%-3.0 pp · #4 | SAR 3,615,000-2,519,000 · #5 | 25.2%-3.3 pp · #4 | 90/100Severe · #6 | 52/100Selective · #3 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 15.2%-7.4 pp · #7 | SAR 3,024,000-3,110,000 · #6 | 25.1%-3.5 pp · #5 | 91/100Severe · #7 | 50/100Selective · #6 |