Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 14.6%+0.0 pp · #2 | SAR 11,512,000+0 · #2 | 21.6%+0.0 pp · #2 | 29/100Moderate · #2 | 85/100Exceptional · #2 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 20.4%+5.9 pp · #1 | SAR 25,403,000+13,891,000 · #1 | 28.5%+6.8 pp · #1 | 27/100Moderate · #1 | 88/100Exceptional · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | 2.3%-12.3 pp · #8 | -SAR 19,664,000-31,176,000 · #8 | 4.3%-17.4 pp · #8 | 35/100Moderate · #8 | 77/100Strong · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 13.5%-1.1 pp · #5 | SAR 9,121,000-2,391,000 · #4 | 20.2%-1.5 pp · #5 | 30/100Moderate · #3 | 85/100Exceptional · #3 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 14.6%+0.0 pp · #3 | SAR 11,512,000+0 · #3 | 21.6%+0.0 pp · #3 | 31/100Moderate · #4 | 85/100Exceptional · #4 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 6.7%-7.8 pp · #7 | -SAR 6,126,000-17,638,000 · #7 | 11.0%-10.7 pp · #7 | 32/100Moderate · #7 | 80/100Strong · #7 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 14.0%-0.6 pp · #4 | SAR 5,446,000-6,066,000 · #5 | 20.8%-0.9 pp · #4 | 31/100Moderate · #5 | 85/100Exceptional · #5 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 9.5%-5.1 pp · #6 | -SAR 1,508,000-13,020,000 · #6 | 19.7%-2.0 pp · #6 | 31/100Moderate · #6 | 84/100Strong · #6 |