Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 13.4%+0.0 pp · #2 | SAR 2,415,000+0 · #2 | 19.6%+0.0 pp · #2 | 13/100Low · #2 | 76/100Strong · #2 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 19.2%+5.8 pp · #1 | SAR 6,089,000+3,674,000 · #1 | 26.5%+6.9 pp · #1 | 10/100Low · #1 | 82/100Strong · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | 3.1%-10.4 pp · #8 | -SAR 4,697,000-7,112,000 · #8 | 5.3%-14.3 pp · #8 | 19/100Low · #8 | 64/100Selective · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 8.9%-4.6 pp · #5 | -SAR 401,000-2,816,000 · #4 | 13.3%-6.3 pp · #6 | 15/100Low · #3 | 72/100Attractive · #5 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 6.8%-6.6 pp · #7 | -SAR 1,588,000-4,003,000 · #7 | 10.6%-8.9 pp · #7 | 15/100Low · #4 | 69/100Attractive · #7 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 10.8%-2.6 pp · #3 | SAR 814,000-1,601,000 · #3 | 16.2%-3.4 pp · #3 | 15/100Low · #5 | 73/100Attractive · #3 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 10.7%-2.8 pp · #4 | -SAR 493,000-2,908,000 · #5 | 15.8%-3.8 pp · #5 | 15/100Low · #6 | 73/100Attractive · #4 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 8.5%-5.0 pp · #6 | -SAR 1,164,000-3,579,000 · #6 | 15.8%-3.7 pp · #4 | 15/100Low · #7 | 72/100Attractive · #6 |