Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 14.0%+0.0 pp · #2 | SAR 5,031,000+0 · #2 | 24.1%+0.0 pp · #2 | 39/100Moderate · #2 | 73/100Attractive · #3 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 19.1%+5.1 pp · #1 | SAR 11,052,000+6,021,000 · #1 | 30.9%+6.9 pp · #1 | 36/100Moderate · #1 | 75/100Strong · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | 2.7%-11.2 pp · #8 | -SAR 8,765,000-13,796,000 · #8 | 5.8%-18.3 pp · #8 | 45/100Moderate · #8 | 64/100Selective · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 11.9%-2.1 pp · #5 | SAR 2,732,000-2,299,000 · #4 | 20.7%-3.3 pp · #6 | 40/100Moderate · #3 | 72/100Attractive · #4 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 14.0%+0.0 pp · #3 | SAR 5,031,000+0 · #3 | 24.1%+0.0 pp · #3 | 41/100Moderate · #5 | 74/100Attractive · #2 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 7.3%-6.6 pp · #7 | -SAR 2,340,000-7,371,000 · #7 | 13.7%-10.4 pp · #7 | 42/100Moderate · #6 | 68/100Attractive · #7 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 13.3%-0.6 pp · #4 | SAR 1,992,000-3,039,000 · #5 | 22.9%-1.1 pp · #4 | 42/100Moderate · #7 | 72/100Attractive · #5 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 9.7%-4.3 pp · #6 | -SAR 468,000-5,499,000 · #6 | 21.5%-2.6 pp · #5 | 40/100Moderate · #4 | 72/100Attractive · #6 |