Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 13.2%+0.0 pp · #2 | SAR 3,110,000+0 · #2 | 26.8%+0.0 pp · #2 | 36/100Moderate · #2 | 71/100Attractive · #2 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 17.3%+4.1 pp · #1 | SAR 6,799,000+3,689,000 · #1 | 33.3%+6.5 pp · #1 | 34/100Moderate · #1 | 72/100Attractive · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | 4.0%-9.2 pp · #8 | -SAR 5,410,000-8,520,000 · #8 | 9.8%-17.0 pp · #8 | 43/100Moderate · #8 | 63/100Selective · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 12.0%-1.2 pp · #5 | SAR 2,120,000-990,000 · #4 | 24.5%-2.3 pp · #6 | 37/100Moderate · #3 | 70/100Attractive · #4 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 13.2%+0.0 pp · #3 | SAR 3,110,000+0 · #3 | 26.8%+0.0 pp · #3 | 38/100Moderate · #4 | 71/100Attractive · #3 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 7.6%-5.5 pp · #7 | -SAR 1,497,000-4,607,000 · #7 | 16.8%-10.0 pp · #7 | 40/100Moderate · #7 | 66/100Attractive · #7 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 12.7%-0.5 pp · #4 | SAR 943,000-2,167,000 · #5 | 25.6%-1.1 pp · #4 | 39/100Moderate · #6 | 70/100Attractive · #5 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 9.7%-3.5 pp · #6 | -SAR 356,000-3,466,000 · #6 | 24.6%-2.1 pp · #5 | 38/100Moderate · #5 | 70/100Attractive · #6 |