Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 8.9%+0.0 pp · #2 | -SAR 321,000+0 · #2 | 16.7%+0.0 pp · #2 | 30/100Moderate · #2 | 83/100Strong · #3 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 13.6%+4.6 pp · #1 | SAR 2,423,000+2,744,000 · #1 | 23.9%+7.2 pp · #1 | 27/100Moderate · #1 | 87/100Exceptional · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | -0.6%-9.6 pp · #8 | -SAR 6,557,000-6,236,000 · #8 | -1.4%-18.1 pp · #8 | 36/100Moderate · #8 | 75/100Strong · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 8.4%-0.6 pp · #4 | -SAR 656,000-335,000 · #4 | 15.7%-1.0 pp · #4 | 31/100Moderate · #3 | 83/100Strong · #4 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 8.9%+0.0 pp · #3 | -SAR 321,000+0 · #3 | 16.7%+0.0 pp · #3 | 32/100Moderate · #5 | 84/100Strong · #2 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 2.6%-6.3 pp · #7 | -SAR 3,833,000-3,512,000 · #7 | 5.3%-11.4 pp · #7 | 33/100Moderate · #6 | 78/100Strong · #7 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 8.4%-0.6 pp · #5 | -SAR 1,750,000-1,429,000 · #5 | 15.6%-1.1 pp · #5 | 33/100Moderate · #7 | 83/100Strong · #5 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 6.0%-3.0 pp · #6 | -SAR 2,957,000-2,636,000 · #6 | 14.8%-1.9 pp · #6 | 31/100Moderate · #4 | 82/100Strong · #6 |