Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 12.6%+0.0 pp · #2 | SAR 1,433,000+0 · #2 | 21.8%+0.0 pp · #2 | 32/100Moderate · #2 | 72/100Attractive · #2 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 17.6%+5.0 pp · #1 | SAR 3,885,000+2,452,000 · #1 | 28.8%+7.0 pp · #1 | 30/100Moderate · #1 | 75/100Strong · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | 1.7%-10.9 pp · #8 | -SAR 4,168,000-5,601,000 · #8 | 3.5%-18.3 pp · #8 | 39/100Moderate · #8 | 64/100Selective · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 11.0%-1.6 pp · #5 | SAR 688,000-745,000 · #4 | 19.2%-2.6 pp · #6 | 33/100Moderate · #3 | 71/100Attractive · #4 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 12.6%+0.0 pp · #3 | SAR 1,433,000+0 · #3 | 21.8%+0.0 pp · #3 | 34/100Moderate · #4 | 72/100Attractive · #3 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 5.9%-6.7 pp · #7 | -SAR 1,611,000-3,044,000 · #7 | 11.1%-10.7 pp · #7 | 35/100Moderate · #6 | 67/100Attractive · #7 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 11.9%-0.6 pp · #4 | SAR 201,000-1,232,000 · #5 | 20.7%-1.1 pp · #4 | 35/100Moderate · #7 | 71/100Attractive · #5 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 8.6%-4.0 pp · #6 | -SAR 840,000-2,273,000 · #6 | 19.4%-2.4 pp · #5 | 34/100Moderate · #5 | 71/100Attractive · #6 |