Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 14.0%+0.0 pp · #2 | SAR 5,455,000+0 · #2 | 21.9%+0.0 pp · #2 | 31/100Moderate · #2 | 85/100Exceptional · #2 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 19.1%+5.1 pp · #1 | SAR 11,983,000+6,528,000 · #1 | 28.5%+6.5 pp · #1 | 28/100Moderate · #1 | 90/100Exceptional · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | 4.8%-9.2 pp · #8 | -SAR 7,118,000-12,573,000 · #8 | 8.9%-13.1 pp · #8 | 37/100Moderate · #8 | 74/100Attractive · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 10.7%-3.3 pp · #5 | SAR 1,419,000-4,036,000 · #4 | 17.0%-4.9 pp · #6 | 33/100Moderate · #3 | 81/100Strong · #4 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 7.9%-6.1 pp · #7 | -SAR 1,863,000-7,318,000 · #7 | 13.3%-8.7 pp · #7 | 33/100Moderate · #4 | 78/100Strong · #7 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 11.6%-2.4 pp · #3 | SAR 2,528,000-2,927,000 · #3 | 18.7%-3.3 pp · #4 | 33/100Moderate · #5 | 81/100Strong · #5 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 11.5%-2.5 pp · #4 | -SAR 51,000-5,506,000 · #5 | 18.3%-3.7 pp · #5 | 33/100Moderate · #6 | 82/100Strong · #3 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 9.3%-4.7 pp · #6 | -SAR 1,097,000-6,552,000 · #6 | 18.7%-3.2 pp · #3 | 33/100Moderate · #7 | 81/100Strong · #6 |