Scenario comparison
Base
Only supported outputs change; asset and workspace context remain intact.
Outputs and ranking
| Scenario | IRR | NPV | Margin | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved canonical baseline assumptions | 22.9%+0.0 pp · #2 | SAR 16,332,000+0 · #2 | 28.5%+0.0 pp · #2 | 61/100High · #2 | 58/100Selective · #2 |
| Price +8% · Rent +6% · Occupancy +3% · Development cost -2% · Demand +6 points | 29.6%+6.7 pp · #1 | SAR 24,916,000+8,584,000 · #1 | 34.8%+6.3 pp · #1 | 59/100High · #1 | 60/100Selective · #1 |
| Price -10% · Rent -9% · Occupancy -8% · Development cost +7% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +3 months · Demand -10 points | 10.3%-12.6 pp · #8 | -SAR 211,000-16,543,000 · #8 | 15.4%-13.2 pp · #8 | 67/100High · #8 | 48/100Weak · #8 |
| Development cost +12% | 17.2%-5.8 pp · #5 | SAR 9,662,000-6,670,000 · #5 | 22.2%-6.4 pp · #6 | 64/100High · #5 | 56/100Selective · #5 |
| Price -10% · Demand -3 points | 15.5%-7.5 pp · #6 | SAR 6,991,000-9,341,000 · #7 | 20.6%-7.9 pp · #7 | 63/100High · #3 | 54/100Selective · #7 |
| Price -4% · Occupancy -12% · Demand -5 points | 20.0%-2.9 pp · #3 | SAR 12,596,000-3,736,000 · #3 | 25.6%-3.0 pp · #3 | 63/100High · #4 | 57/100Selective · #4 |
| Price -3% · Financing cost +2% · Demand -3 points | 19.9%-3.1 pp · #4 | SAR 9,676,000-6,656,000 · #4 | 25.2%-3.3 pp · #4 | 64/100High · #6 | 58/100Selective · #3 |
| Development cost +4% · Financing cost +1% · Delivery +9 months · Demand -2 points | 15.4%-7.6 pp · #7 | SAR 8,102,000-8,230,000 · #6 | 25.0%-3.6 pp · #5 | 64/100High · #7 | 55/100Selective · #6 |